Wesley Corporation v. Zoom T v. Products
Wesley Corporation v. Zoom T v. Products
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
WESLEY CORPORATION, DAVID HANSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
ZOOM T.V. PRODUCTS, IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________
2019-1477 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC- SDD, Judge Robert H. Cleland. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DANIEL MCCARTHY, Butzel Long, Bloomfield Hills, MI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
JOSHUA GARY LATZMAN, Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone PLC, Troy, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished