Halozyme, Inc. v. Iancu
Halozyme, Inc. v. Iancu
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HALOZYME, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1011 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:16-cv-01580-CMH- JFA, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM G. GAEDE, III, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also rep- resented by MANDY H. KIM, Irvine, CA; SAMI SEDGHANI, San Francisco, CA; PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, JOSHUA DAVID ROGACZEWSKI, Washington, DC.
FRANCES LYNCH, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, AMY J.
NELSON; JAYNIE RANDALL LILLEY, United States Depart- ment of Justice, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.