In Re ESCOBOSA
In Re ESCOBOSA
Opinion
Case: 18-2259 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 02/06/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: MARCUS ESCOBOSA, PATRICK H. HAYES, JAMES N. CONWAY, JR., Appellants ______________________ 2018-2259 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/736,761. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by BENJAMIN GILFORD, GARY R. JAROSIK.
MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, AMY J. NELSON. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 18-2259 Document: 56 Page: 2 Filed: 02/06/2020
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.