Veneris v. Army
Veneris v. Army
Opinion
Case: 20-1447 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 12/11/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MARK VENERIS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________ 2020-1447 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-4324-19-0707-I-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHERI L. CANNON, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by MICHAEL WILSON MACOMBER, Albany, NY.
ROBERT R. KIEPURA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JEFFREY B. CLARK, CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR. ______________________ Case: 20-1447 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 12/11/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 11, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.