Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation
Opinion
Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 03/02/2021
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant
v.
INTEL CORPORATION, Appellee
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2020-1574 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018- 01261, IPR2018-01293, IPR2018-01295, IPR2018-01344, IPR2018-01346. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________ Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 2 Filed: 03/02/2021
JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellant. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA.
THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH; JOSEPH F. HAAG, Palo Alto, CA; RAUVIN A. JOHL, YVONNE S. LEE, Boston, MA.
WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 2, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished