Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation

Opinion

Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 03/02/2021

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2020-1574 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018- 01261, IPR2018-01293, IPR2018-01295, IPR2018-01344, IPR2018-01346. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________ Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 2 Filed: 03/02/2021

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellant. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA.

THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH; JOSEPH F. HAAG, Palo Alto, CA; RAUVIN A. JOHL, YVONNE S. LEE, Boston, MA.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 2, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished