Vtt Technical Research Centre v. Sitime Corporation
Vtt Technical Research Centre v. Sitime Corporation
Opinion
Case: 20-2189 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2021
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SITIME CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-2189 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:19-cv-01174-YGR, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM WOODFORD, Avantech Law, LLC, Minneap- olis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Fish & Richardson PC, Minneapolis, MN; MICHAEL R. HEADLEY, Redwood City, CA.
DAVID A. JAKOPIN, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ROBERT M. FUHRER, McLean, VA; KENNETH E. KELLER, San Francisco, CA.
Case: 20-2189 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2021
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, SCHALL and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 10, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.