U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2021

Sunoco Partners Marketing v. Magellan Midstream Partners

Sunoco Partners Marketing v. Magellan Midstream Partners
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 12, 2021

Sunoco Partners Marketing v. Magellan Midstream Partners

Opinion

Case: 20-1719 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 07/12/2021

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P., Appellant v. MAGELLAN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P., POWDER SPRINGS LOGISTICS, LLC, Appellees ______________________ 2020-1719, 2020-1720 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019- 00024, IPR2019-00025. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN R. KEVILLE, Winston & Strawn LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL C.

KRILL, MICHELLE REPLOGLE; RICHARD L. STANLEY, Law Of- fice of Richard L. Stanley, Houston, TX.

NITIKA GUPTA FIORELLA, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wil- mington, DE, argued for all appellees. Appellee Magellan Midstream Partners L.P. also represented by MARTINA Case: 20-1719 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 07/12/2021

TYREUS HUFNAL, DOUGLAS E. MCCANN.

DAVID S. MORELAND, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for appellee Powder Springs Logistics, LLC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 12, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.