In Re SINGHAL
In Re SINGHAL
Opinion
Case: 20-2318 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 09/14/2021
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: TARA CHAND SINGHAL, Appellant ______________________ 2020-2318 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/928,710. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WALTER D. DAVIS, JR., Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant Tara Chand Singhal.
KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 20-2318 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 09/14/2021
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Cir- cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 14, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.