Blackberry Limited v. Hirshfeld
Blackberry Limited v. Hirshfeld
Opinion
Case: 21-1124 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 11/08/2021
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLACKBERRY LIMITED, Appellant v. ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2021-1124 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 00706. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by SEAN GLOTH, II; JAMES R. ASPERGER, Los Ange- les, CA; FELIPE CORREDOR, SAM STEPHEN STAKE, San Francisco, CA, KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON, Redwood Shores, CA.
Case: 21-1124 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 11/08/2021
MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, MICHAEL S. FORMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner November 8, 2021 Peter R. Marksteiner Date Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.