Levi Strauss & Co. v. Aqua Dynamics Systems, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 21-1871 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 01/06/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Plaintiff-Appellee v.
AQUA DYNAMICS SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant ______________________
2021-1871 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:15-cv-04718-WHO, Judge William H. Orrick, III.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT A. MCFARLANE, Hanson Bridgett LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also repre- sented by ROSANNA GAN, JOSEPHINE KENDRA PETRICK, GARY A. WATT.
JAMES LEE MICHAELS, Browne George Ross O'Brien An- naguey & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defend- ant-appellant. Also represented by ERIC C. LAURITSEN.
______________________
Case: 21-1871 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 01/06/2022 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PLAGER and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner January 6, 2022 Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.