Wright Medical Technology, Inc v. Paragon 28, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Wright Medical Technology, Inc v. Paragon 28, Inc.

Opinion

Case: 21-1340 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 01/04/2022

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant

v.

PARAGON 28, INC., Appellee ______________________

2021-1340, 2021-1342, 2021-1344, 2021-1345 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019- 00894, IPR2019-00895, IPR2019-00896, IPR2019-00898. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

PATRICK D. MCPHERSON, Duane Morris LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DONALD JOSEPH ENGLISH, PATRICK C. MULDOON; SAMUEL W. APICELLI, Philadelphia, PA; PIERRE J. HUBERT, DIANA SANGALLI, Austin, TX; THOMAS W. SANKEY, Houston, TX.

GREG MATTHEW POLINS, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chi- cago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by MEREDITH ZINANNI; LUKE DAUCHOT, SHARRE LOTFOLLAHI, Los Angeles, CA. Case: 21-1340 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 01/04/2022

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Reference

Status
Unpublished