Wright Medical Technology, Inc v. Paragon 28, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 21-1340 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 01/04/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant v. PARAGON 28, INC., Appellee ______________________
2021-1340, 2021-1342, 2021-1344, 2021-1345
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019- 00894, IPR2019-00895, IPR2019-00896, IPR2019-00898.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
PATRICK D. MCPHERSON, Duane Morris LLP, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DONALD JOSEPH ENGLISH, PATRICK C. MULDOON; SAMUEL W. APICELLI, Philadelphia, PA; PIERRE J. HUBERT, DIANA SANGALLI, Austin, TX; THOMAS W. SANKEY, Houston, TX.
GREG MATTHEW POLINS, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chi- cago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by MEREDITH ZINANNI; LUKE DAUCHOT, SHARRE LOTFOLLAHI, Los Angeles, CA.
Case: 21-1340 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 01/04/2022
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.