Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.
Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp.
Opinion
Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORP., Appellant
v.
NEVRO CORP., Appellee ______________________
2021-1775 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 01284. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
Z.W. JULIUS CHEN, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by PRATIK A. SHAH; MICHAEL P. KAHN, New York, NY; DAVID A. CAINE, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC.
RYAN C. MORRIS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III; CHING-LEE FUKUDA, SHARON LEE, New Case: 21-1775 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2022
York, NY; JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished