Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 21-1473 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 03/14/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., Appellant v. AURIS HEALTH, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1473 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 01173. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARPITA BHATTACHARYYA; FRANK A. DECOSTA, III, Washington, DC; ROBERT KING HIGH, III, Atlanta, GA. CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III, RYAN C. MORRIS, Washington, DC; PAUL J.
ROGERSON, Chicago, IL.
Case: 21-1473 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 03/14/2022
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 14, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.