Fairfax v. Army
Opinion
Case: 21-1802 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 04/07/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ DUANE FAIRFAX, Petitioner v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Respondent ______________________ 2021-1802 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Nos. DC-1221-18-0499-W-3, DC-1221-19-0257-W- 2.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
DANIEL MEYER, MATTHEW F. MIHALICH, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
STEVEN C. HOUGH, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, ELIZABETH MARIE HOSFORD, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY.
______________________
Case: 21-1802 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 04/07/2022 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 7, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.