Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.
Opinion
Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ SIPCO, LLC, Appellant v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1039, 2021-1040 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019- 00545, IPR2019-00547.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
JASON E. STACH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN; JAMES R. BARNEY, CONSTANTINE GREGORY GRAMENOPOULOS, Wash- ington, DC.
DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., DANIEL W. RICHARDS, East Palo Alto, CA.
Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2022
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 3, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.