Winet Labs LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Winet Labs LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Opinion
Case: 22-1081 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 09/12/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WINET LABS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1081 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:20-cv-01094, Senior Judge Harry D. Leinenweber. ______________________ Decided: September 12, 2022 ______________________ MATTHEW MICHAEL WAWRZYN, Wawrzyn LLC, Chi- cago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
STEPHEN MAXWELL HANKINS, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-ap- pellee. Also represented by LOUIS A. KLAPP, MICHAEL HARRINGTON FLECK, Chicago, IL. ______________________ Before DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
Case: 22-1081 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 09/12/2022
2 WINET LABS LLC v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
PER CURIAM.
The district court dismissed this case for lack of stand- ing without specifying whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice. The parties agree that the dismissal must be without prejudice. This court understands the dis- trict court’s dismissal of this case to have been without prejudice. On this basis, we affirm the district court’s de- cision to dismiss this case for lack of standing.
Appellant also challenges the district court’s decision to award attorney fees, a decision that is not final and ap- pealable until the award has been quantified. Because the award has not been quantified, we lack jurisdiction. Fa- lana v. Kent State Univ., 669 F.3d 1349, 1360–61 (Fed. Cir. 2012). We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal.
AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.