U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2022

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided October 14, 2022

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation

Opinion

Case: 20-1948 Document: 116 Page: 1 Filed: 10/14/2022

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CELLSPIN SOFT, INC., Appellant v. PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, GOPRO, INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA, INC., Appellees KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2020-1948 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019- 00131. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III, Case: 20-1948 Document: 116 Page: 2 Filed: 10/14/2022

Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX.

MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America also represented by T. VANN PEARCE, JR. KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ.

JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M.

BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.