Moghadam v. DVA
Moghadam v. DVA
Opinion
Case: 21-2221 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 11/09/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
NAFISEH T. MOGHADAM, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________
2021-2221 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-1221-19-0198-W-2. ______________________
Decided: November 9, 2022 ______________________
MATTHEW ROSTON, Roston Law Group, Beverly Hills, CA, argued for petitioner.
DOUGLAS GLENN EDELSCHICK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Jus- tice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also repre- sented by REGINALD THOMAS BLADES, JR., BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY; MAUREEN NEY, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veteran Af- fairs, Los Angeles, CA. ______________________ Case: 21-2221 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 11/09/2022
2 MOGHADAM v. DVA
Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. REYNA, Circuit Judge. Nafiseh T. Moghadam appeals a Merit Systems Protec- tion Board (“Board”) decision that denied her Whistle- blower Protection Act claims. Based on the record before us, we affirm the decision of the Board. On appeal, Ms. Moghadam asserts that “she is entitled under both the [Whistleblower Protection Act] and the [Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act] to re- quest . . . attorney fees.” Reply Br. 6. We do not address this issue because it was not decided below and has not been properly raised before this court. AFFIRMED COSTS No costs.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished