US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal
US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 21-2212 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 11/28/2022
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ US INVENTOR, INC., TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, HEROS, INC, RAMZI MAALOUF, LARRY GOLDEN, WORLD SOURCE ENTERPRISES, LLC, E-WATCH, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Com- merce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2212 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:21-cv-00047-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Upon consideration of the appellants’ unopposed mo- tion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42 of the Case: 21-2212 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 11/28/2022
2 US INVENTOR, INC. v. VIDAL
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties’ joint response to the court’s November 8, 2022, order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is withdrawn. (2) The parties shall bear their own costs.
FOR THE COURT November 28, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 28, 2022
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.