U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2022

Polaris Innovations Limited v. United States

Polaris Innovations Limited v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided December 7, 2022

Polaris Innovations Limited v. United States

Opinion

Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2022

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-1831 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00116. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN; MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores, CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH J.

WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Ange- les, CA.

PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022

intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N.

PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 7, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.