Polaris Innovations Limited v. United States
Polaris Innovations Limited v. United States
Opinion
Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-1831 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00116. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN; MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores, CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH J.
WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Ange- les, CA.
PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022
intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N.
PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 7, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.