In Re BODO
In Re BODO
Opinion
Case: 22-1244 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 12/08/2022
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: MARTIN JOSEPH BODO, Appellant ______________________ 2022-1244 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/691,433. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DONALD E. SCHREIBER, Law Offices of Donald E.
Schreiber, Kings Beach, CA, argued for appellant.
MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 22-1244 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 12/08/2022
PER CURIAM (PROST, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 8, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.