U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2023

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 13, 2023

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co.

Opinion

Case: 22-1342 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 01/13/2023

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellant v. GLUX VISUAL EFFECTS TECH (SHENZHEN) CO., LEYARD OPTOELECTRONIC CO., SHENZHEN LIANTRONICS CO., LTD., UNILUMIN GROUP CO., LTD., Appellees ______________________ 2022-1342, 2022-1343 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020- 01049, IPR2020-01050. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, JOSEPH M. MERCADANTE, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III.

KEVIN PAUL MARTIN, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by JORDAN Case: 22-1342 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 01/13/2023

BOCK; NAOMI BIRBACH, LINNEA P. CIPRIANO, New York, NY; MONTE COOPER, Redwood City, CA; PATRICK MCCARTHY, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.