Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Glux Visual Effects Tech (Shenzhen) Co.
Opinion
Case: 22-1342 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 01/13/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ULTRAVISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Appellant v.
GLUX VISUAL EFFECTS TECH (SHENZHEN) CO., LEYARD OPTOELECTRONIC CO., SHENZHEN LIANTRONICS CO., LTD., UNILUMIN GROUP CO.,
LTD.,
Appellees
______________________
2022-1342, 2022-1343 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020- 01049, IPR2020-01050.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, JOSEPH M. MERCADANTE, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III.
KEVIN PAUL MARTIN, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by JORDAN Case: 22-1342 Document: 36 Page: 2 Filed: 01/13/2023 BOCK; NAOMI BIRBACH, LINNEA P. CIPRIANO, New York, NY; MONTE COOPER, Redwood City, CA; PATRICK MCCARTHY, Washington, DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.