Trinity Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States
Opinion
Case: 22-1329 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 01/18/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
TRINITY MANUFACTURING, INC., ASHTA CHEMICALS, INC., NIKLOR CHEMICAL
COMPANY, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1329 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:20-cv-03831-TCS, Senior Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
ADAM H. GORDON, The Bristol Group PLLC, Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by LAUREN FRAID, JENNIFER MICHELE SMITH.
GEOFFREY MARTIN LONG, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Jus- tice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, PATRICIA M.
Case: 22-1329 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 01/18/2023 MCCARTHY; IAN ANDREW MCINERNEY, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, United States Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 18, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.