In re DENG
Opinion
Case: 22-1568 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE: HAIXIA DENG, YONGBONG HAN, CHARAN MASARAPU, YOGESH KUMAR ANGUCHAMY,
HERMAN A. LOPEZ, SUJEET KUMAR,
Appellants ______________________ 2022-1568 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/425,696.
______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
PETER S. DARDI, Christensen Fonder Dardi & Herbert, PLLC, Maple Grove, MN, argued for appellants Haixia Deng, Yongbong Han, Charan Masarapu, Yogesh Kumar Anguchamy, Herman A. Lopez, Sujeet Kumar. Also repre- sented by DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., Wadena, MN.
DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, BRIAN RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
______________________
Case: 22-1568 Document: 29 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2023 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (CHEN, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 7, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.