In Re GOLDEN RULE FASTENERS, INC.
In Re GOLDEN RULE FASTENERS, INC.
Opinion
Case: 21-2103 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: GOLDEN RULE FASTENERS, INC., Appellant ______________________ 2021-2103 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/865,534, 90/014,257. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES F. MCDONOUGH, III, Rozier Hardt McDonough PLLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant Golden Rule Fas- teners, Inc. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, BRIAN RACILLA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 21-2103 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2023
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, TARANTO and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 3, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.