Marin Partners v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc.
Marin Partners v. Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 23-1624 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 08/17/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MARIN PARTNERS, dba marin partners, Appellant v. HEAVEN HILL DISTILLERIES, INC., dba The Wine Group, Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Com- merce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor ______________________ 2023-1624 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 92077885. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Before CHEN, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
ORDER Case: 23-1624 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 08/17/2023
2 MARIN PARTNERS v. HEAVEN HILL DISTILLERIES, INC.
The Director of the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office (PTO) moves for leave to intervene in this ap- peal and to remand to permit further proceedings before the PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Marin Part- ners opposes those requests. The Director replies.
Remand “is usually appropriate” to allow an agency to reconsider its previous position. SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 254 F.3d 1022, 1029 (Fed. Cir. 2001). We agree that remand is appropriate under the circumstances here, which may facilitate this court’s review and preserve judi- cial resources.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The Director’s motion is granted. The revised offi- cial caption is reflected in this order, and the case is re- manded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the motion and this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT August 17, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Date Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.