Raybine v. McDonough
Raybine v. McDonough
Opinion
Case: 20-1218 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 09/27/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CHARLES J. RAYBINE, Claimant-Appellant
v.
DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________
2020-1218 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 18-6117, Judge Joseph L. Falvey, Jr., Judge Joseph L. Toth, Judge William S. Greenberg. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________
PER CURIAM. 1 ORDER
1 Circuit Judge Newman did not participate. Case: 20-1218 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 09/27/2023
2 RAYBINE v. MCDONOUGH
Upon consideration of the Secretary’s unopposed mo- tion to remand the case to the United States Court of Ap- peals for Veterans Claims, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to re- consider its decision in light of Taylor v. McDonough, 71 F.4th 909 (Fed. Cir. 2023) (en banc), which held that when a veteran has been determined to be en- titled to benefits for one or more disabilities con- nected to participation in the Edgewood program at issue, the required effective date of such benefits is the date that the veteran would have had in the absence of the challenged government conduct— imposition of the secrecy oath with no VA route for claim presentation and proof to vindicate the bene- fits entitlement. Taylor, 71 F.4th at 946.
FOR THE COURT
September 27, 2023 Date
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished