Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 10/11/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, Appellant v. NEENAH, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1951, 2022-1952, 2022-1953 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020- 01361, IPR2020-01363, IPR2021-00016. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan & Dawson PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J.
ROBBENNOLT.
JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 10/11/2023
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2023 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.