Goode v. Cook
Goode v. Cook
Opinion
Case: 23-2023 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 10/18/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JASON GOODE, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut De- partment of Correction, in his official and individ- ual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Divi- sion, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, ELLEN DURKO, RN, Connecticut Department of Correction, in her individual capacity, KRISTINE BARRONE, Warden, MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution, Con- necticut Department of Correction, in her official and individual capacities, GIULIANA MUDANO, Warden, Northern Correctional Institution, Con- necticut Department of Correction, in her official and individual capacities, ANGEL QUIROS, Deputy Commissioner, Operations and Rehabilitative Ser- vices Division, in his official and individual capaci- ties, DAVID MAIGA, Director, Offender Classification and Population Management, Con- necticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, ANDREA REISCHERL, Psychiatric APRN, Connecticut Department of Cor- rection, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees Case: 23-2023 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 10/18/2023
2 GOODE v. COOK
______________________
2023-2023 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in No. 3:20-cv-00210-VAB, Judge Victor A. Bolden. ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Jason Goode filed a complaint in the United States Dis- trict Court for the District of Connecticut raising claims un- der 42 U.S.C. § 1983 relating to his imprisonment. After the district court granted summary judgment against his claims, Mr. Goode filed this appeal. In response to this court’s July 31, 2023, order to show cause, the appellees urge dismissal of this appeal. Mr. Goode “argues for the proper transfer[] of this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.” ECF No. 16 at 1. Mr. Goode’s appeal does not fall within the limited au- thority that Congress granted to this court to review deci- sions of federal district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a). That jurisdiction generally extends to cases arising under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain dam- ages claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). This is not one of those cases. Though the appellees urge dismissal, we deem it the better course to transfer to the United States Court of Ap- peals for the Second Circuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Accordingly, Case: 23-2023 Document: 20 Page: 3 Filed: 10/18/2023
GOODE v. COOK 3
IT IS ORDERED THAT: The appeal and all its filings are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pur- suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. FOR THE COURT
October 18, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Date Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished