Blair v. DVA
Blair v. DVA
Opinion
Case: 23-1626 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 10/30/2023
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ADRIAN E. BLAIR, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________
2023-1626 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA-0752-16-0302-I-1. ______________________
Before LOURIE, MAYER, and STARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Because Adrian E. Blair asserted before the Merit Sys- tems Protection Board that his removal was in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws and indicated that he did not wish to abandon his discrimination claims on judicial review, this court directed the parties to show cause why this case should not be transferred. Having now considered the responses to that order, we transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Case: 23-1626 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 10/30/2023
2 BLAIR v. DVA
As respondent correctly notes, this is a “[c]ase[] of dis- crimination subject to the provisions of [5 U.S.C. §] 7702,” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2). We lack jurisdiction over such a case, which must instead be brought in federal district court. Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 582 U.S. 420 (2017). Under the circumstances, we find it appropriate to transfer pur- suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to the Northern District of Texas, where the employment action occurred. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for review and all of the filings are trans- mitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. FOR THE COURT
October 30, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Date Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished