Case: 24-1970 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUNSET HOUSING SOLUTIONS, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2024-1970 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:21-cv-08627-CAS-E, Senior Judge Christina A. Snyder. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez moves to revise the cap- tion. The court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdic- tion. Mr. Calderon Lopez brought suit against appellees in California state court and then sought to remove the case Case: 24-1970 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 07/25/2024

2 SSA v. CALDERON LOPEZ

to federal court. On November 4, 2021, the district court remanded the case to state court. Mr. Calderon Lopez ap- pealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which dismissed his appeal as frivo- lous on July 14, 2022. That same day, the district court entered an order rejecting a filing from Mr. Calderon Lopez. On June 11, 2024, Mr. Calderon Lopez filed a notice of appeal directed to this court from a “07/14/2022” deci- sion. ECF No. 1-2 at 1. To the extent Mr. Calderon Lopez seeks review of a de- cision of the Ninth Circuit, we lack jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295. To the extent he instead seeks review of the district court’s decision, “the timely filing of a notice of ap- peal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within 60 days after entry of final judgment when the case involves a United States agency, 28 U.S.C. § 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4. Here, Mr. Calderon Lopez’s notice of appeal, filed nearly two years after the July 2022 decision, is clearly untimely. For at least this reason, we and any other court of appeals lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed, and all pending motions are denied. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT

July 25, 2024 Date