Case: 24-1998 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 07/23/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight Consulting Services, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BEVERLY HILLS, CA, Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2024-1998 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:23-cv-08579-DMG- SHK, Judge Dolly M. Gee. ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER On January 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Ricardo J. Calderon Lopez’s complaint seeking relief against defend- ants for alleged personal injuries. Mr. Calderon Lopez ap- pealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which dismissed on March 26, 2024 for failure to prosecute. On June 11, 2024, Mr. Calderon Case: 24-1998 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 07/23/2024

2 CALDERON LOPEZ v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA

Lopez filed a notice of appeal directed to this court from a decision entered “05/26/2024.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1. We dismiss. To the extent Mr. Calderon Lopez in- tended to appeal from the Ninth Circuit’s March 26, 2024 decision, this court lacks jurisdiction to review decisions of the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295. To the extent that Mr. Calderon seeks review of a ruling by the district court, we note that the district court’s docket does not list a deci- sion issued on May 26, 2024 and an appeal from the dis- missal order would be untimely. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“The timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT

July 23, 2024 Date