U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2024

Burns v. McDonough

Burns v. McDonough
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 22, 2024

Burns v. McDonough

Opinion

Case: 24-1233 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 07/22/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ELLEN T. BURNS, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Af- fairs, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1233 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 20-5933, Judge Michael P. Allen. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Before PROST, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

TARANTO, Circuit Judge.

ORDER The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, stat- ing: Because neither [that court] nor the Board [of Vet- erans’ Appeals] addressed whether the Case: 24-1233 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 07/22/2024

2 BURNS v. MCDONOUGH

complications of diabetes reflected in Mr. Burns’s treatment records entitled him to an increase in his rating for service-connected diabetes in light of Part V.iii.11.2.c. of the M21-1 Adjudication Proce- dures Manual, the parties respectfully submit that a remand would conserve resources and promote judicial efficiency here. The parties further agree that, upon remand, the Veterans Court should ad- dress this theory of entitlement and determine whether any further proceedings are necessary to resolve Mrs. Burns’s accrued benefits claim.

Mot. at 5.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for further proceedings consistent with this order and the par- ties’ joint motion. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

July 22, 2024 Date ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 22, 2024

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.