B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 23-1126 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 08/13/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C., Appellant v. TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE LLC, Cross-Appellants ______________________
2023-1126, 2023-1127, 2023-1128, 2023-1130, 2023-1131,
2023-1132 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021- 00482, IPR2021-00483, IPR2021-00484, IPR2021-00485.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, ar- gued for appellant. Also represented by CHARLES WIZENFELD, King & Wood Mallesons LLP, New York, NY.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all cross-appellants. Cross-appellant Google LLC also represented by DAN L. BAGATELL, Hano- ver, NH; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI; ANDREW BALUCH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 23-1126 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 08/13/2024
DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, for cross-appellant Twitter, Inc. Also represented by DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS; ANGELA M. OLIVER, Washington, DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.