B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.

Opinion

Case: 23-1126    Document: 51    Page: 1   Filed: 08/13/2024




        NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                  ______________________

                B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
                        Appellant

                            v.

            TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE LLC,
                   Cross-Appellants
                ______________________

 2023-1126, 2023-1127, 2023-1128, 2023-1130, 2023-1131,
                       2023-1132
                ______________________

     Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
 Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
 00482, IPR2021-00483, IPR2021-00484, IPR2021-00485.
                  ______________________

                       JUDGMENT
                  ______________________

    KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, ar-
 gued for appellant.   Also represented by CHARLES
 WIZENFELD, King & Wood Mallesons LLP, New York, NY.

     NATHAN K. KELLEY, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington,
 DC, argued for all cross-appellants. Cross-appellant
 Google LLC also represented by DAN L. BAGATELL, Hano-
 ver, NH; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI; ANDREW
 BALUCH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 23-1126     Document: 51   Page: 2   Filed: 08/13/2024




    DAVID L. MCCOMBS, Haynes and Boone, LLP, Dallas,
 TX, for cross-appellant Twitter, Inc. Also represented by
 DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS; ANGELA M. OLIVER, Washington,
 DC.
                  ______________________

 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

 ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

     PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit
 Judges).
                AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                         ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT




August 13, 2024
    Date


Reference

Status
Unpublished