Calderon Lopez v. State of California
Calderon Lopez v. State of California
Opinion
Case: 24-2133 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 08/22/2024
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight Consulting Services, dba Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., dba Starlight Music Management, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR RECORDER OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, Of- fice of the Secretary of State, Defendants ______________________ 2024-2133 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 1:19-cv-01139-UNA, Judge Col- leen Kollar-Kotelly. ______________________ PER CURIAM.
ORDER On May 17, 2019, the district court dismissed Ricardo J. Calderon Lopez’s complaint. Mr. Calderon Lopez Case: 24-2133 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 08/22/2024
2 CALDERON LOPEZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Dis- trict of Columbia Circuit, which dismissed for failure to prosecute on October 17, 2019. On July 23, 2024, Mr. Cal- deron Lopez filed a notice of appeal directed to this court from a decision entered “05/17/2019” in the district court action. ECF No. 1-2 at 1. “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), and this appeal, filed over five years after the district court’s May 17, 2019 decision, is clearly un- timely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4. For at least this reason, we and any other court of appeals lack juris- diction.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
August 22, 2024 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.