Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 11/12/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RENEE ANNETTE CHRUSTOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General and Chief Exec- utive Officer, Defendant-Appellee

USPS HEADQUARTERS, GIANT FOODS, Defendants ______________________

2024-2075 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:24-cv-00037-CFC, Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly. ______________________

Before BRYSON, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER In response to this court’s August 16, 2024 show cause order, Louis DeJoy urges dismissal. Renee Annette Chrustowski requests transfer “to a court or agency who is Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 11/12/2024

2 CHRUSTOWSKI v. DEJOY

willing to compensate [her] with the monetary compensa- tion that [she is] entitled to.” ECF No. 7 at 1. Ms. Chrustowski filed her complaint at the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on Janu- ary 11, 2024, claiming $100 million of damages for alleged labor violations. She moved to proceed in forma pauperis, which the district court granted on February 13, 2024. Ms. Chrustowski filed a notice of appeal to this court on July 8, 2024, indicating she was seeking review of “pending court of appeals 3rd Circuit P.A.” ECF No. 1-2 at 1. The district court has not issued any further orders or decisions. We dismiss. This court’s jurisdiction to review deci- sions of federal district courts is limited to cases arising under the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil ac- tions on review to the district court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cer- tain damages claims against the United States “not exceed- ing $10,000 in amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(1). Ms. Chrustowski’s complaint raises no such claim. Transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit or any other circuit is not appropriate here under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, because Ms. Chrustowski is not appealing from a decision that could give rise to a proper appeal in any court of appeals. Nor has Ms. Chrustowski shown any basis to transmit this matter to the Supreme Court of the United States to the extent the notice was in- tended to seek review of unspecified Third Circuit deci- sions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The case is dismissed. Case: 24-2075 Document: 12 Page: 3 Filed: 11/12/2024

CHRUSTOWSKI v. DEJOY 3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT

November 12, 2024 Date