Asetek Danmark A/S v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 22-1050 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 02/12/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ASETEK DANMARK A/S,
Appellant v.
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor ______________________
2022-1050 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020- 00523. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT F. MCCAULEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appel- lant. Also represented by ARPITA BHATTACHARYYA.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, MICHAEL Case: 22-1050 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 02/12/2024
S. FORMAN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 12, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.