Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal
Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 22-1536 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2022-1536 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020- 01210. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JASJIT S. VIDWAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E.
ANDERSON, RICHARD J. BERMAN, JANINE A. CARLAN.
WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by OMAR FAROOQ Case: 22-1536 Document: 56 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2024
AMIN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, PETER JOHN SAWERT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 6, 2024 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.