Analog Devices, Inc. v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 22-1612 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Appellant v.
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor ______________________
2022-1612 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020- 01561.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
JANINE A. CARLAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E. ANDERSON, JASJIT S. VIDWAN.
PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, ar- gued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, Case: 22-1612 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024 BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 5, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.