Sito Mobile R&D Ip, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
Opinion
Case: 22-1990 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,
Appellants v. HULU, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-1990, 2022-1991 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021- 00298, IPR2021-00304.
______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.
BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also repre- sented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN; Case: 22-1990 Document: 60 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024 NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 5, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.