Case: 22-1926 Document: 83 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants

v.

HULU, LLC, Appellee ______________________

2022-1926, 2022-1927, 2022-1977, 2022-1989, 2022-2262 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021- 00158, IPR2021-00206, IPR2021-00219, IPR2021-00265, IPR2021-00308. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.

AMY LIANG, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN, BRETT JOHNSTON Case: 22-1926 Document: 83 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024

WILLIAMSON, Newport Beach, CA NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 5, 2024 Date