CUPP COMPUTING AS v. VIDAL
Opinion
Case: 23-1129 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ CUPP COMPUTING AS, Appellant v.
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor ______________________
2023-1129 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00813.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by JAMES R. HANNAH; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY.
PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Case: 23-1129 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2024 intervenor. Also represented by FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, KEVIN RICHARDS.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, HUGHES, and STARK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 10, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.