Case: 24-118 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2024

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ON24, INC., Plaintiff-Petitioner v. WEBINAR.NET, INC., Defendant-Respondent ______________________ 2024-118 ______________________ On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b) from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:21- CV-07721-EMC, Judge Edward M. Chen. ______________________ ON PETITION ______________________ Before CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER ON24, Inc. petitions for permission to appeal an inter- locutory order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting partial summary Case: 24-118 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2024

2 ON24, INC. v. WEBINAR.NET, INC.

judgment, which the district court certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

Under § 1292(b), a district court may certify that an or- der that is not otherwise appealable is one involving a con- trolling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and for which an immedi- ate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termina- tion of the litigation. Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether to grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order. See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Pat. Litig., 903 F.2d 822, 822 (Fed. Cir. 1990). In this case, we conclude that an interlocutory ap- peal under § 1292(b) is not appropriate.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for permission to appeal is denied.

FOR THE COURT

May 3, 2024 Date