Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal
Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/16/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2022-2173 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00346. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M.
DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/16/2024
argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 16, 2024 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.