Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal

Opinion

Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/16/2024

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2022-2173 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00346. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG.

MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/16/2024

argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 16, 2024 Date

Reference

Status
Unpublished