Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal
Opinion
Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/16/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v.
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor ______________________
2022-2173 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00346.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Case: 22-2173 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/16/2024 argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 16, 2024
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.