U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2024

Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided June 11, 2024
Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Opinion

Case: 22-2134 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 06/11/2024

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,

Appellant v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., APPLE INC.,

Appellees ______________________

2022-2134 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00145.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________

PHILIP GRAVES, Graves & Shaw LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREER N. SHAW; ROBERT M. ASHER, Sunstein LLP, Boston, MA; BRYCE BARCELO, ROCCO MAGNI, BRIAN MELTON, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX; KALPANA SRINIVASAN, Los Angeles, CA.

STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellees. Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Case: 22-2134 Document: 76 Page: 2 Filed: 06/11/2024 Inc. also represented by TIFFANY CAROL MILLER; JAMES MARTIN HEINTZ, Reston, VA.

LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wash- ington, DC, for appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by WALTER KARL RENNER; NITIKA GUPTA FIORELLA, Wilming- ton, DE; ALEXANDER MICHAEL PECHETTE, Boston, MA.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 11, 2024

Date

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.