Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Case: 22-2134 Document: 76 Page: 1 Filed: 06/11/2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC, Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., APPLE INC., Appellees ______________________ 2022-2134 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 00145. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PHILIP GRAVES, Graves & Shaw LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by GREER N. SHAW; ROBERT M. ASHER, Sunstein LLP, Boston, MA; BRYCE BARCELO, ROCCO MAGNI, BRIAN MELTON, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX; KALPANA SRINIVASAN, Los Angeles, CA.
STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for appellees. Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Case: 22-2134 Document: 76 Page: 2 Filed: 06/11/2024
Inc. also represented by TIFFANY CAROL MILLER; JAMES MARTIN HEINTZ, Reston, VA. LAUREN ANN DEGNAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wash- ington, DC, for appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by WALTER KARL RENNER; NITIKA GUPTA FIORELLA, Wilming- ton, DE; ALEXANDER MICHAEL PECHETTE, Boston, MA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 11, 2024 Date
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.