U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2025

Masimo Corporation v. Apple Inc.

Masimo Corporation v. Apple Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided March 5, 2025

Masimo Corporation v. Apple Inc.

Opinion

Case: 25-1216 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 03/05/2025

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MASIMO CORPORATION, Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2025-1216 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 00634. ------------------------------------------------- APPLE INC., Appellant v. MASIMO CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2025-1217 ______________________ Case: 25-1216 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 03/05/2025

2 MASIMO CORPORATION v. APPLE INC.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023- 00634. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER The parties file Federal Circuit Form 18, Joint Stipula- tion of Voluntary Dismissal indicating the voluntary dis- missal of Appeal No. 2025-1216 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b)(1). ECF No. 15. Apple Inc. separately moves unopposed to extend the time to file its opening brief in Appeal No. 2025-1217. ECF No. 16.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Appeal No. 2025-1216 is voluntarily dismissed.

The revised official caption for the remaining appeal, Ap- peal No. 2025-1217, is reflected in this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 2025-1216. (3) Apple’s opening brief in Appeal No. 2025-1217 is due no later than 60 days after the date of entry of this order.

Case: 25-1216 Document: 17 Page: 3 Filed: 03/05/2025

MASIMO CORPORATION v. APPLE INC. 3

(4) ECF No. 16 is denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

March 5, 2025 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2025-1216 only): March 5, 2025

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.