Case: 24-1345 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2025

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FINTIV, INC., Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2024-1345 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022- 00976. ______________________ Decided: April 30, 2025 ______________________ MEREDITH LEIGH MARTIN ADDY, AddyHart P.C., At- lanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHARLES A. PANNELL, III; BENJAMIN CAPPEL, Chicago, IL; CAREN YUSEM, Washington DC; JECEACA AN, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY; MARCUS BARBER, JOHN DOWNING, DARCY L. JONES, HEATHER KIM, THUCMINH NGUYEN, JONATHAN K. WALDROP, Redwood Shores, CA.

FAN ZHANG, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellee. Also represented by DOUGLAS Case: 24-1345 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2025

2 FINTIV, INC. v. APPLE INC.

HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER; JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, CHRISTOPHER M. BONNY, East Palo Alto, CA; BRIAN LEBOW, CASSANDRA B. ROTH, New York, NY. ______________________ Before PROST, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PROST, Circuit Judge.

Fintiv, Inc. (“Fintiv”) appeals a final written decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board holding claims 1–3 of U.S. Patent No. 9,892,386 (“the ’386 patent”) unpatenta- ble. Today we issued an opinion in related case Fintiv, Inc. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., No. 23-2312 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2025), holding, among others, claims 1–3 of the ’386 patent invalid as indefinite. There is no dispute that our affir- mance in the related case compels dismissing as moot this appeal. See Oral Arg. at 0:27–0:40, No. 24-1345, https://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx?fl= 24-1345_03032025.mp3. Accordingly, having affirmed in the related case, we dismiss as moot this appeal.

DISMISSED