Sydnexis, Inc. v. Eyenovia, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 23-2402 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/12/2025
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
______________________ SYDNEXIS, INC., Appellant v. EYENOVIA, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-2402, 2023-2403, 2023-2411 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022- 00384, IPR2022-00414, IPR2022-00415.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by JAD ALLEN MILLS; KELSEY CATINA, RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC.
THOMAS H. WINTNER, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glov- sky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PETER CUOMO, WILLIAMS DIXON.
______________________
Case: 23-2402 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/12/2025 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 12, 2025
Date
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.