Xerox Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Xerox Corporation v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 23-1714 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 06/17/2025
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ XEROX CORPORATION, Appellant v. META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA FACEBOOK, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023-1714 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 01264. ______________________ Decided: June 17, 2025 ______________________ KYLE N. RYMAN, McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, TX, ar- gued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES ELROY QUIGLEY; KEVIN L. BURGESS, Marshall, TX; ALEXANDRA FIGARI EASLEY, DAVID SOCHIA, Dallas, TX.
HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DANIEL JEDEDIAH KNAUSS, MARK R. WEINSTEIN. ______________________ Case: 23-1714 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 06/17/2025
2 XEROX CORPORATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC.
Before STOLL, CLEVENGER, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
In our opinion in Xerox Corp. v. X Corp., No. 23-1913 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2025), issued concomitantly with this opinion, we affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board holding all claims (1–18) of U.S. Patent No. 7,043,475 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The in- stant appeal involves a subset of those very claims: 1–3, 5, 7, 10–12, and 15–16. For the reasons we explained in Ap- ple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., 976 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2020), this appeal is rendered moot in light of our decision in X Corp. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
DISMISSED COSTS No costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.