U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2025

Evans v. Collins

Evans v. Collins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided July 25, 2025

Evans v. Collins

Opinion

Case: 23-2356 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/2025

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JOSHUA EVANS, Claimant-Appellant v. DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2023-2356 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 21-1242, Judge Joseph L. Toth. ______________________ Decided: July 25, 2025 ______________________ KENNETH DOJAQUEZ, Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also repre- sented by PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, BRETT SHUMATE; BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, RICHARD STEPHEN HUBER, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

Case: 23-2356 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 07/25/2025

2 EVANS v. COLLINS

______________________ Before LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges, and BUMB, Chief District Judge. 1 PER CURIAM.

Joshua Evans appeals a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“the Veterans Court”) affirming a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Ap- peals (“the Board”). Evans v. McDonough, No. 21-1242, 2023 WL 3671133 (Vet. App. May 26, 2023); J.A. 19–23 (Board Decision). On appeal to this court, Evans princi- pally argues that the Veterans Court erred in affirming the Board’s decision that he did not implicitly raise an earlier claim for total disability due to unemployability (“TDIU”) under Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet. App. 447 (2009). We lack jurisdiction over this issue because it involves the applica- tion of the legal standard stated in Rice to the facts of this case. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2) (providing that we lack juris- diction over “a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case”). We therefore dismiss.

DISMISSED COSTS No costs.

1 Honorable Renée M. Bumb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.